International Journal of Biomedical Science 4(2), 120-124, Jun 15, 2008
Original Article


© 2005 Master Publishing Group

Bone Densitometric Analysis in Egyptian Hemodialysis Patients

Ehab I. Mohamed1,1 and Eman S.D. Khalil2

1 Department of Medical Biophysics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt;

2 Department of Nephrology, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Corresponding Author: Prof. Ehab I. Mohamed, Department of Medical Biophysics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 El Horreya Avenue, 21561 Alexandria, Egypt. Tel: (+20) 3 428 2331/2373/3543/5455; Fax: (+20) 3 428 3719; Mobile: (+20) 12 932 2010; E-mail: eimohamed@yahoo.com.

Running title: tissue plasminogen activator gene and essential hypertension


  ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES


 ABSTRACT

End-stage renal failure (ESRF) is the ultimate consequence of chronic renal failure, in which case dialysis is generally required. In dialysed patients, almost all patients have abnormal bone histology and their lower values of glomerular filtration rate have been associated with lower bone mineral density (BMD) at all sites. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of hemodialysis (HD) on body-composition (BC), specially segmental and total BMD, in Egyptian ESRF patients. Forty ESRF patients [20 male/20 female; mean age (±SD): 52.11 ± 12.97 yr] undergoing regular HD 3 times/week (duration: 6.50 ± 5.68 yr) using bicarbonate dialysis and polysulphon membrane, and other 40 age- and sex-matched healthy controls volunteered in the study. Blood samples were obtained for monitoring serum levels of calcium (Ca), inorganic phosphate (P), osteocalcin (OC), and parathormone (PTH) for all participants. BC was evaluated by dual X-ray absorptiometry. HD patients manifested lower segmental and total BMD values in comparison with age-matched healthy controls (Z-score: -0.17±1.12) due to significantly higher levels of P (4.04 ± 1.33 vs. 3.39 ± 0.51 mg/dl, p < 0.001), PTH (538.17 ± 363.99 vs. 48.86 ± 19.64 ng/L, p < 0.0001), and OC (50.39 ± 34.91 vs. 16.32 ± 5.37 mg/L, p < 0.0001). Pelvis, lumbar spine, and total BMD (g/cm2) for HD patients were significantly correlated with HD duration (yr) (R = 0.94, 80, and 92, respectively, p < 0.0001). Thus, BC analysis is of utmost importance for efficiently providing tailored individual mineral supplementation to HD patients.



KEY WORDS:   
end-stage renal failure; hemodialysis, bone mineral density; dual-enenrgy X-ray absorptiometry; parathyroid hormone; osteocalcin

 INTRODUCTION

    End-stage renal failure (ESRF) is the ultimate consequence of chronic renal failure (CRF) and dialysis is generally required until a donor for a renal transplant is found. During progressive renal failure, phosphate retention causes secondary hyperparathyroidism, which leads to hypoplastic bone, characterized by increased bone turnover (1). In the immediate predialysis period, almost all patients have abnormal bone histologies (2), and their lower values of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and in some studies elevated intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) values, have been associated with lower bone mineral density (BMD) at all sites (3, 4). Additional major bone response patterns include mixed osteodystrophy (hyperparathyroid plus defective mineralization) and low-turnover bone disease (adynamic, aluminum induced, or osteomalacia). Patient age and underlying illness, the degree and period of renal impairment, mode of dialysis, and drug management of hyperparathyroidism, and serum calcium and phosphate influence these patterns of bone histology (5).

    Dialysis patients most often are elderly, with numerous comorbid conditions and in poor nutritional health state (6). These patients can also have low body weight and body mass index (BMI), low levels of body fat mass (BFM) and lean body mass (LBM) (7, 8) and have been observed to be at increased risk of osteoporosis (9) and hip fracture (10-13). Hip fractures are a common cause of morbidity and mortality (14). Furthermore, dialysis patients have altered fluid and electrolyte homeostasis (15, 16), which are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications (17, 18), another major cause of morbidity and mortality in renal patients (19, 20). The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of hemodialysis (HD) on body-composition (BC), specially segmental and total BMD, in Egyptian ESRF patients.

 SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Subject

    The study population was comprised of 80 subjects, who were divided into two groups. The first [n = 40 (20 male/20 female); mean age (± SD) 52.11 ± 12.97 yr, and age range 21.00–74.00 yr] is the study group, which consisted of ESRF patients undergoing regular HD 3 times/week for 4 hours using bicarbonate dialysis to maintain a minimum Kt/V urea index of 1.20 per session. HD patients were followed-up at the Nephrology Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Egypt for a mean period of 6.50 ± 5.68 yr and duration range 0.08–20.00 yr. The second (n=40) is the control group, which was matched with the study group for age, height, and sex. All study participants were asked to volunteer to the study and provide signed informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. The study protocol was in conformity with ethical guidelines of the Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Egypt.

    HD patients who had an age below 20 years, rheumatic bone disease, history of rickets or osteomalacia before the onset of CRF, history of congenital kidney diseases, history of corticosteroid therapy before the onset of CRF for more than 6 months, history of recurrent kidney transplantation or recent transplantation of less than 6 months, or a positive test for hepatitis B surface antigen or for hepatitis C virus antibodies, were excluded from the study.

    All HD patients received bicarbonate dialysis using a low flux polysulphon membrane (F6, Fresenius, Germany), and sessions were conducted under the same standard conditions, with sterile apyrogen delivered water. Blood and dialysate flow-rates were maintained at 250 ml/min and 500 ml/min respectively. The final dialysate concentration was: HCO3- 35.0 mM, Na+ 140.0 mM, K+ 1.5–2.0 mM, Ca2+ 1.5 mM. All patients received heparin as a continuous infusion.

laboratory Measurements

    Complete history was obtained for all participants with emphasis on categorizing bone aches and history of fractures, and complete physical examination with emphasis on bone, joints, and neurological examination. Blood samples were obtained from fasting healthy controls and from HD patients before and after dialysis sessions. Samples were immediately centrifuged and 50 ml of plasma were mixed with 100 ml of 5% metaphosphoric acid. Samples were aliquoted and stored at – 80°C until assayed. Blood urea (Ur) and serum creatinine (Cr) were evaluated as detailed elsewhere (21). Serum levels of calcium (Ca) and inorganic phosphate (P) (22), PTH (23, 24), and osteocalcin (OC) (25), were also determined. The Kt/V urea index was calculated according to the formula (26):

       Kt/V=-In(R-0.008t)+(4.0-3.5R)×UF/W                             Eq. 1

    where R is the post-dialysis/pre-dialysis blood urea concentration, t is the duration of dialysis session in hours, UF is the volume of fluid removed during dialysis, and W is the post-dialysis weight in kg

Body-Composition and Bone Densitometric Measurements

    Segmental and total BC [i.e., BFM, LBM, bone mineral content (BMC), and BMD] were measured for all participants using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (DPX Pro, GE Health Care, USA) at the Department of Medical Biophysics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Egypt. DXA is the method of choice of BMD for the diagnosis of osteopenia/osteoporosis as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) (27).

Statistical Analysis

    Analyses of all data were carried out using the statistical software package StatView 5.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Descriptive statistics were calculated for the mean ± SD of all relevant variables. Two-tailed t-test of significance was used to compare different variables between the HD and control groups. Differences were considered to be significant at p<0.05.

 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Demographic variables of the study groups and clinical diagnoses of kidney disease of HD patients are presented in Table 1. Diagnosis of the kidney disease was based on clinical and biochemical examinations and echography of all patients, showing that 16 patients (40%) had glomerulonephritis, 8 (20%) had vascular nephropathy, 12 (30%) had diabetes type II, 2 (5%) had polycystic kidney disease, while 2 patients (5%) had shown other causes.

    Both weight and BMI were significantly lower for HD patients as compared to healthy controls (66.36 ± 15.44 and 26.79 ± 5.89 vs. 84.05 ± 17.51 kg and 31.30 ± 6.15 kg/m2, respectively, p<0.001), as a direct consequence of long durations of dialysis reaching 20 yr in some patients. The BC data for study groups are shown in Figure 1. The segmental (i.e., arms, legs, and trunk) and total BFM for HD patients (Figure 1A) were significantly lower (p<0.001), except for arms BFM, (2.04 ± 1.13, 7.42 ± 3.82, 11.63 ± 5.53, and 21.79 ± 10.05 kg, respectively) as compared to healthy controls (3.06 ± 1.30, 12.30 ± 4.85, 17.74 ± 6.71, and 33.97 ± 12.04 kg, respectively). The same trend of difference between the two groups was also observed for segmental and total LBM, BMC, and BMD (Figure 1B, 1C, and 1D, respectively). These data are in line with previous findings showing that dialysis patients are in poor nutritional health state evidenced by low body weight, BMI, BFM, and LBM (6-8), thus being at an increased risk of osteoporosis and hip fracture (9-13).

    Serum levels of biochemical markers of renal function of both studied groups are shown in Table 2. Pre-dialysis blood Ur and Cr for HD patients were significantly higher than those for healthy controls (123.51 ± 40.92 and 10.91 ± 2.61 vs. 32.07 ± 8.12 and 0.88 ± 0.17 mg/dl, respectively, p<0.0001). While serum Ca levels were comparable in both groups, inorganic P levels for HD patients were significantly higher than those for healthy controls (4.04 ± 1.33 vs. 3.39 ± 0.51 mg/dl, p<0.05), which resulted in a significantly higher (p<0.05) Ca ´ P product. PTH and OC levels were also significantly higher for HD patients as compared to healthy controls (538.17 ± 363.99 and 50.39 ± 34.91 vs. 48.86 ± 19.64 ng/L and 16.32 ± 5.37 mg/L, respectively, p<0.0001). The evident variability of PTH levels for HD patients, which ranged from 93.90 to 1594.00 ng/L, may derive from the degree of CRF, the duration of dialysis, and the type of dialysis membrane, which are mainly affected by the socioeconomic level of Egyptian patients. Due to poverty, Egyptian CRF patients tend to be referred for dialysis very late, usually at Cr clearance levels below 10 ml/min, and they typically cannot afford expensive phosphate binders. Phosphate retention during progressive renal failure has been shown to cause secondary hyperparathyroidism (i.e., increased levels of PTH), leading to hypoplastic bones, characterized by increased bone turnover (1). Moreover, altered fluid and electrolyte homeostasis in dialysis patients has been shown to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications,  one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in renal patients (15-18).

    In depth analysis of BMD at all sites showed that arms, legs, pelvis, and total BMD (Table 3) were significantly lower (p<0.001) for HD patients as compared to healthy controls. Overall T- and Z-Scores for HD patients were significantly lower than those for healthy controls (- 0.44 ± 1.26 and - 0.17 ± 1.12 vs. 0.57 ± 1.21 and 0.28 ± 1.01, respectively, p<0.001). Moreover, pelvis, lumbar spine; representing two of the sites more susceptible to fracture risk; and total BMD for HD patients were significantly correlated with HD duration (R=0.94, 80, and 92, respectively, p<0.0001). Earlier studies have shown that lower values of GFR associated with elevated intact PTH values were associated with lower BMD at all sites (3, 4), as demonstrated by abnormal bone histology for patients in the immediate pre-dialysis period (2). These patterns of bone histology were influenced by patient age and underlying illness, the degree and period of renal impairment, mode of dialysis, and drug management of hyperparathyroidism, and serum Ca and inorganic P (5).

    In conclusion long term HD is associated with alteration of fluid and electrolyte homeostasis in ESRF patients. That is, observed P retention and elevated Ca ´ P product, which causes secondary hyperparathyroidism leading to significant lowering of segmental and total BMD. Thus, BC analysis is of utmost importance for efficiently providing tailored individual mineral supplementation during dialysis sessions to HD patients.

 

View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Graphical plot of segmental (i.e., arms, legs, and trunk) and total body-composition analysis for hemodialysis patients (n=40) in comparison with healthy controls (n=40). A, Body Fat Mass (BFM, kg); B, Lean Body Mass (LBM, kg); C, Bone Mineral Content (BMC, kg); D, Bone Mineral Density (BMD, g/cm2). Data are presented as mean ± SD. *P<0.001 and **P<0.05 as compared to healthy controls

View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Demographic and clinical diagnosis of kidney disease data for hemodialysis patients (n=40) and healthy controls (n=40)


View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 2. Blood biochemical data for hemodialysis patients (n=40) and healthy controls (n=40)


View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 3. Segmental and total Bone Mineral Density (BMD, g/cm2) data together with T- and Z-Scores for hemodialysis patients (n=40) and healthy controls (n=40)

 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    The authors would like to express their gratitude to Dr. Shatha N. Khalaf, Mrs. Hedaya Zaky, and Mrs. Ayat Mohamed for the professional assistance provided during the experimental part of this study.

    This study was supported by a grant from the Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education and State for Scientific Research, HEEPF Fund: D-185-H0, 2005/2007.

 REFERENCES
  1. Delmez JA, Slatopolsky E. Recent advances in the pathogenesis and therapy of uremic secondary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1991; 72: 735 - 739.
  2. Hutchison AJ, Whitehouse RW, Boulton HF, et al. Correlation of bone histology with parathyroid hormone, vitamin D3, and radiology in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 1993;44: 1071.
  3. Bianchi ML, Colantonio G, Montesano A, et al. Bone mass status in different degrees of chronic renal failure. Bone 1992; 13: 225.
  4. Rix M, Andreassen H, Eskildsen P, et al. Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in patients with predialysis chronic renal failure. Kidney Int 1999; 56: 1084.
  5. Elder G. Pathophysiology and Recent Advances in the Management of Renal Osteodystrophy. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 2094.
  6. Collins AJ, Hanson G, Umen A, et al. Changing risk factor demographics in end-stage renal disease patients entering hemodialysis and the impact of long term mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 15: 422.
  7. Burrowes JD, Levin NW. Morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Diet Curr 1992; 19: 10.
  8. Owen WF, Lew NL, Liu Y, et al. The urea reduction ratio and serum albumin concentration as predictors of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1001.
  9. Aroldi A, Tarantino A, Montagnino G. Effects of three immunosuppressive regimens on vertebral bone density in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 1997; 63: 380.
  10. Epstein S, Shane E, Bilezikian JP. Organ transplantation and osteoporosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 1995; 7: 255.
  11. Ramsey-Goldman R, Dunn JE, Dunlop DD. Increased risk of fracture in patients receiving solid organ transplants. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 456
  12. Alem AM, Sherrard DJ, Gillen DL. Increased risk of hip fracture among patients with end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int 2000; 58: 396.
  13. Coco M, Rush H. Increased incidence of hip fractures in dialysis patients with low serum parathyroid hormone. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 1115.
  14. Riggs BL, Melton LJ. The prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 1992; 327: 620.
  15. Brennan BL. Serial measurement of body composition and total body mineral content in dialysis and nondialysis patients with renal failure. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1987; 13: 451.
  16. Kaneko TM, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, et al. Clinical Epidemiology of Long-bone Fractures in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis Clin Orthop Relat R 2007; 457: 188.
  17. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32: S112.
  18. Raggi P, Boulay A, Chasan-Taber S, et al. Cardiac calcification in adult hemodialysis patients. A link between end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular disease? J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 695.
  19. Malluche H, Faugere M-C. Renal bone disease: An unmet challenge for the nephrologist. Kidney Int 1990; 38: 193.
  20. Hocher B, Ziebig R, Altermann C, et al. Different Impact of Biomarkers as Mortality Predictors among Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2329.
  21. Skarzynski CJ, Wu AHB. Renal function. In: Clinical Chemistry Principles, Procedures and Correlations. Bishop ML, Fody EP, Schoeff L Eds. 5th Edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005; pp. 517.
  22. Polancic JE. Electrolytes. In: Clinical Chemistry Principles, Procedures and Correlations. Bishop ML, Fody EP, Schoeff L Eds. 5th Edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2005; pp. 314.
  23. Friedman PA. Mechanisms of renal calcium transport. Exp Nephrol 2000; 8: 343.
  24. Casez JP, Ammattir PF. Diagnostic approach to hypercalcemia: relevance of parathyroid hormone and parathyroid hormone related protein measurements. Euro J Int Med 2001; 12: 344.
  25. Lee AJ, Hodges S, Eastell R. Measurement of osteocalcin. Ann Clin Biochem 2000; 37: 432.
  26. Depner TA, Dargirdas JT, Equations for normalized protein catabolic rate based on two-point modeling of hemodialysis urea kinetics. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7: 780.
  27. World Health Organization Scientific Group. Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report Series 921. WHO, Geneva, 2003; pp. 53.
  28. Casini A, Mohamed EI, Gandin C, et al. Predicting bone mineral density of postmenopausal healthy and cirrhotic Italian women using anthropometric variables. Digest Liver Dis 2003; 35: 881.
  29. Mohamed EI. A suggested method for calculating human basal metabolic rate using total body electric capacitance. Egypt J Biophys Biomed Engng 2004; 5: 105.
ContentFullText

The exquisite patterns on the luxury replica watches dial, the date display window at replica watches six o'clock, and the black sculpted Arabic numerals demonstrate the replica rolex exquisite craftsmanship of rolex watches uk the fine watchmaking style.