Received- April 6, 2010; Accepted- April 20, 2010
 International Journal of Biomedical Science 6(2), 150-157, Jun 15, 2010
ORIGINAL ARTICLE


© 2005 Master Publishing Group

A New Spectrophotometric Method for Determination of Phenylpropanolamine HCl in its Pharmaceutical Formulations via Reaction with 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone

M. I. Walash, N. El-Enany, S. Saad

1 Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Mansoura, Mansoura, Egypt;

Corresponding Author: N. El-Enany, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Mansoura, 35516, Mansoura, Egypt. Tel: 002050-2247496; E-mail: nelenany1@yahoo.com.


  ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES


 ABSTRACT

A selective and simple spectrophotometric method has been developed for the determination of phenylpropanolamine HCl (PPA) in its dosage forms. The method was based on the formation of a colored N-vinyl chlorobenzoquinone derivative of PPA through its reaction with 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone in presence of acetaldehyde. The colored product exhibits maximum absorbance at 650 nm. Different experimental parameters affecting formation and stability of the product were carefully studied and optimized. The factors affecting the reaction were studied and optimized. The stoichiometry of the reaction was determined, and the reaction pathway was postulated. The absorbance concentration plot was rectilinear over the range of 5-100 µg/mL with Limit of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) of 0.244 µg/mL and 0.74 µg/mL respectively. The analytical performance of the method was fully validated, and the results were satisfactory. The proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of PPA in its commercial dosage forms including tablets, capsules and syrups with good recoveries. Statistical comparison of the results with those of the comparison method showed good agreement and proved that there was no significant difference in the accuracy and precision between the reference and the proposed methods. The mechanism of the reaction pathway was postulated.

KEY WORDS:    spectrophotometry; method for determination of Phenylpropanolamine HCl; 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone; dosage forms

 INTRODUCTION

   Phenylpropanolamine is a largely indirect acting sympathomimetic with an action similar to ephedrine, it is orally administered for the treatment of nasal congestion. It is frequently used in mixture preparations for the relief of cough and cold symptoms. Other uses of phenylpropanolamine include the control of the urinary incontinence in some patients .It has also been used to suppress appetite in the management of obesity (1).

   PPA is Benzemethanol, α-(1-aminoethyl)-hydrochloride,(R*,S*)-,(±).(±) Norephedrine hydrochloride (Fig. 1). The USP (2) and the BP (3) recommended non aqueous titrimetric method for the determination of PPA  in  the pure form by adding mercuric acetate and titration with perchloric acid and using crystal violet as indicator, while both USP (2) and BP (3) recommended HPLC dertermination of PPA in dosage forms with UV detection at 210 nm. Due to its clinical advantages, PPA received a great interest. Several analytical techniques have been reported for PPA determination such as; titrimetry (4, 5), spectrophotometry (6-8), flourimetry (9), Raman spectroscopy (10), NMR (11), HPLC (2-15), CE (16-20), flow injection (21, 22), HPTLC (23), micellar chromatography (24-27), ion pair chromatography (28) and GC (29).

   Concerning the published spectrophotometric method (6) it could be applied over the concentration range of 0.36-0.88 mg/mL., therefore it is less sensitive than the present sudy.

   On the other hand, the other published spectrophotometric method (7) is depending on using the second derivative technique for the determination of PPA which is highly susceptible to interference from common tablets excipients.

   The main advantage of the present study is the formation of colored product at 650 nm where interference from common tablet excipients are highly eliminated.

   Spectrophotometry is considered the most convenient analytical technique, because of its inherent simplicity, low cost, and wide availability in most laboratories. The proposed method was based on the formation of a colored N- vinyl chlorobenzoquinone derivative of PPA by its reaction with 2,3,5,6-tetra chlorobenzoquinone (TCBQ) in the presence of acetaldehyde (ACD).


View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 1. Structural formula of phenylpropanolamine. HCl (PPA).

 EXPERIMENTAL

   Instruments

   A shimadzu UV-Visible 1601 PC spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan) was used for spectrophotometric measurements (P/N 206-67001). The recording range was 0-1.2.

   Reagents and materials

   All the reagents used were of Analytical Grade and distilled water is used throughout the work.

   Phenylpropanolamine HCl with a purity of 99.89% (6) (Batch #41204) was kindly supplied by EPICO (10th of Ramadan Egypt).

   Preparation of the sample

   An accurately weighed amount (100 mg) of PPA was dissolved in 10 mL distilled water. The solution was transferred quantitively to 100 mL separating funnel, and the solution was rendered alkaline with 5 mL of 10% NaOH solution. The liberated base was extracted with three times, each with 25 mL of  chloroform .The combined organic extract was passed through anhydrous sodium sulphate into 100 mL volumetric flask, the volume was completed with chloroform to obtain a standard solution of 1000 μg/mL, calculated as the hydrochloride salt. This solution was further diluted with the same solvent to obtain the working solution. The solutions were found to be stable for at least one week when kept in the refrigerator.

   General recommended procedures

   Construction of calibration graph. Aliquot volumes of the drug covering the working concentration range (5-100 µg/mL, final concentration) were quantitatively transferred to a series of 10 mL volumetric flask To each flask 1.2 mL of ACD solution (8% v/v in propan-2-ol ) and 1.2 mL of TCBQ (3 × 10-2 M in 1,4-dioxan) were added. The solution was allowed to stand for 20 minutes at room temperature and the solution was diluted to the volume with propan-2-ol. The absorbance of the reaction product was measured at 650 nm versus a reagent blank prepared simultaneously. The calibration graph was constructed by plotting the absorbance versus the final concentration of the drug (µg/mL). Alternatively, the corresponding regression equation was derived.

   Assay procedure for tablets. Ten tablets were weighed, pulverized and mixed well. A weighed quantity of the powdered tablets equivalent to 100 mg PPA was dissolved in 10 mL distilled water, sonicated for 15 minutes. The solution was firstly filtered then transferred quantitively to 100 mL separating funnel and the procedures described under "Construction of calibration graph" were performed. The nominal content of the tablets was calculated using the corresponding regression equation.

   Assay procedure for capsules and syrups. The weighed quantity of the mixed and powedered contents of ten capsules or an accurately measured volume of the syrup equivalent to 100 mg of the drug were transferred to a small conical flask and was dissolved in 10 mL of distilled water. The solution was sonicated for 15 minutes, filtered and completed as in raw material.

 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

   Results

   Phenylpropanolamine is aweakly absorbing compound and it exhibits weak absorbance at λ max 261 nm such problem is highly aggravated when it is necessary to determine the drug in pharmaceutical preparations.

   Enamine formation is of particular interest in pharmaceutical analysis as it can be used as a basis for the quantitative analysis of many pharmaceutical compounds. Enamine is formed through the interaction of the amino group of the drug molecule with ACD with the formation of N- alkylamine(enamine). The enamine condenses with the TCBQ to give a highly colored vinylamino-subistituted quinone, which can be measured spectrophotometrically with a maximum absorbance at 650 nm. Several compounds of pharmaceutical interest were determined through such approach (30-32). (Fig. 2).


View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 2. Absorption spectra of the reaction: (a) PPA (70 μg/mL) in chloroform; (b) Reagent blank; (c) Reaction product of (70μg/mL) PPA with TCBQ.

   Study of Experimental Parameters. Different factors affecting color development and its stability were carefully studied and optimized. Each was changed while the others were kept constant


View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 3. Effect of reaction time on the absorbance value of the reaction product of 100 μg/mL PPA with ACD 8%, v/v and TCBQ 3 × 10-2 M at room temperature.
 

View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 4. Effect of TCBQ on the absorbance values of the formed vinylamino subistituted haloquinone using 100 μg/mL of PPA.
 

View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 5. Effect of [ACD] volume on the absorbance value of the formed vinylamino subistituted halo quinone using 100 μg/ mL PPA using 3 × 10-2 M TCBQ.

View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. Analytical parameters for the determination of PPA by the proposed method

   Validation of the proposed Methods

   The validity of the proposed methods was tested regarding linearity, specificity, accuracy, repeatability and precision according to ICH Q2 (R1) recommendations (33).

   Linearity. The calibration graphs obtained by plotting the values of the absorbance versus the final concentrations were found to be rectilinear over the concentration ranges cited in (Table 2). The proposed method was evaluated for the accuracy as percent relative error (% Er) and the precision as percent relative standard deviation (% RSD) (Table 2).

   Limit of quantitation and limit of detection. The limits of quantitation (LOQ) was calculated according to ICH Q2B (R1) recommendation (33). The results are shown in (Table 2). The limit of detection (LOD) was calculated according to ICHQ2 (R1). The results are also summarized in (Table 2).

View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 2. Performance data for the proposed methods

   LOQ and LOD were calculated according to the following equations (33):

   LOQ = 10 Sa/b
   LOD = 3.3 Sa/b
   where Sa is the standard deviation of the intercept of regression line, and b is the slopeof the calibration curve.

   Accuracy. To test the validity of the proposed method it was applied for the determination of pure sample of PPA over the concentration range cited in (Table 1). The results obtained were in good agreement with those obtained using the comparison method.  Statistical analysis of the results obtained using Student's t-test and the variance ratio F-test (34) revealed no significance differences between the performance of the proposed and comparison methods regarding the accuracy and precision, respectively (Table 3). The spectrophotometric comparison method (35) based on determination of the studied drug through its reaction with 1, 2- naphthoquinone -4- sulphonate

   The validity of the methods were proved by statistical evaluation of the regression line, using the standard deviation of the residuals (Sy/x), the standard deviation of the intercept (Sa) and standard deviation of the slope (Sb). The results are abridged in (Table 2). The small values of the figures indicate low scattering of the calibration points around the calibration line and high precision.

View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 3. Application of the proposed and comparison methods for the determination of PPA in pure form

   Statistical Analysis

   Precision.

   The mean % recoveries was 100.17% ± 1.2 with % relative standard deviation of 1.19 and % error of 0.69 respectively. Thus, indicates high accuracy and high precision of the proposed method.

   Robustness of the method. The robustness of the method adopted is demonstrated by the constancy of the absorbance with the deliberated minor changes in the experimental parameters such as the change in the volume of TCBQ 3 × 10-2 M (1.2 mL ± 0.2), the change in the volume of ACD 8% (v/v) solution (1.2 ± 0.2) mL, the change in the reaction time 20 ± 5 min and the change in the heating temperature 25 ± 5ºC.These minor changes that may take place during the experimental operation didn’t affect the absorbance of the reactions product.

   Selectivity. The selectivity of the methods was investigated by observing any interference encountered from the common tablet excipients such as starch, lactose, magnesium stearate and avisil. These excipients did not interfere with the proposed method.

   Specificity. Other coformulated drugs specially amine containing drugs such as isopropamide, chlorphenramine maleate, paracetamol and caffeine did not interfere with the proposed method. Since these compounds are highly insoluble in chloroform and so easily eliminated without any interference.

View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 4. Validation of the proposed methods for the determination of PPA in pure form

 DISCUSSION

   Pharmaceutical Applications

   The proposed method was successfully applied to determine the studied drug in its dosage forms. Tablet excipients such as starch, talc, lactose, magnesium stearate and avisil did not interfere with the proposed method. Statistically analysis of the results obtained and compared to those of a comparison method (35) using Student's t-test and the variance ratio F-test revealed no significant difference in the performance of the methods regarding the accuracy and precision respectively (Table 5).

   Mechanism of the reaction

   The stoichiometry of the reaction was studied adopting the limiting logarithmic method in presence of excess of drug and reagent (36). The two straight lines were obtained using increasing concentrations of the two reagents while keeping the concentration of the drug constant and using increasing concentrations of the drug while keeping the concentration of the reagent constant. Plots of log absorbance versus log [TCBQ] and log [PPA] gave two straight lines with slope of 0.61/0.88 for TCBQ and PPA respectively, and 0.7872/0.8811 for ACD and PPA respectively (Fig. 6). Hence, it is concluded that the reaction proceeds in the ratio of 1:1 (TCBQ/PPA).  Based on the obtained molar ratio and by analogy to previous study (32) it is clear that one molecule of the drug reacts with one molecule of ACD and one molecule of TCBQ. The proposed mechanism of the reaction is postulated to proceed as in the following scheme (Fig. 7).


View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 6. Limiting logarithmic plots for the molar reactivity of PPA with the proposed reagents, both of ACD and TCBQ respectively.
 

View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 7. Proposed reaction pathway between TCBQ and PPA under the described reaction conditions.

View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 5. Application of the proposed and comparison methods for the determination of PPA in different dosage forms

 CONCLUSION

   The proposed spectrophotometric method presents selective and simple, specific and inexpensive analytical procedures for determination of PPA, either per se or in its tablet dosage forms without interference from common excipients. Moreover, the developed method is time saving and do not require elaborate treatments associated with chromatographic methods. These attributes, in addition to the satisfactory sensitivity and reproducibility as well as the convenience and simplicity, make the proposed method suitable for routine analysis in quality control laboratories. Other coformulated drugs such as isopropamide, chlorphenramine maleate, paracetamol and caffeine did not interfere with the proposed method

 REFERENCES

    1. Sweetman S, Martindale. The Complete Drug Reference, 35th ed. The Pharmaceutical Press: London. 2007.
    2. The United States Pharmacopoeia 30th and The National formulary 25th, Rockville, MD, USA; 2007.
    3. The British Pharmacopoeia, Her Majesty's Stationary Office. London. 2007.
    4. Walash MI, Abou Ouf A, Salem FB. J. AOAC INT. 1982; 65(6): 1445-1451.
    5. Issa M, Ahmed FA. Youssef, Ali A. Mutair, Il Farmaco. 2005; 60(6-7): 541-546.
    6. Ferreyra CF, Ortiz CS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2002; 29(5):811- 818.
    7. Khuhawar MY. A Rind and Ahmeduddin Rajper J. Food and Drug. Anal. 2005; 13(4):388-391.
    8. El-Gindy A, Emara S, Mostafa A. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006; 421- 430.
    9. Shankle LL. J .Pharm. Sci. 1978; 67(11):1635-1636.
    10. King TH, Mann CK, Vickers TJ. J Pharm Sci.1985;74(4):443-743.
    11. Hanna GM. J AOAC Int. 1995; 78 (4):946-954.
    12. Kaddoumi A, Mori T, Nakashima MN, Wada M, Nakashima K. J .Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004; 34(3):643-650.
    13. Nakashima K, Kanehara S, Kaddoumi A. J. Biomed .Chromatogr. 2002; 16(7):463-469.
    14. Bialecka W, Kulik A, Kaniewska T. J. Acta Pol . Pharm. 2002; 59 (1):9-14.
    15. Aymard G, Labarthe B, Warot D, Berlin I, et al. J Chromatogr B. 2000;744 (1):25-31.
    16. Jouyban A, Chan HK, Khoubnasabjafari M, Clark BJ. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2003; 32 (2):203-208.
    17. Suntornsuk L. J. Electrophoresis. 2001; 22(1):139-143.
    18. Mateus-Avois L, Mangin P, Saugy M. J. Chromatogr B. 2003; 791(1-2):203-216.
    19. Harsono T, Yuwono M, Indrayanto G. J .AOAC Int. 2005; 88(4):1093-1098.
    20. Azhagvuel S, Sekar R. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2007; 43(3):873-878.
    21. Viñas P, López-Erroz C, Cerdán FJ, Hernández-Córdoba M. Talanta. 1998;47(2):455-462.
    22. Issa YM, Khalil MM, Zayed ZIM, Ahmed Hussein. Arabian J. chem. 2009; 2(1):41-46.
    23. Greshock T, Sherma J. J Planar Chromtogr Mod TLC. 1997; 10(6):460-463.
    24. Gil-Agusti M, Monferrer-Pons L, Garcia-Alvarez-Coque M, Esteve-Romero J. Talanta. 2001; 54 (4):621-630.
    25. Gil-Agusti M, Torres-Lapasio JR, Garcia-Alvarez-Coque MC, Esteve-Romero J. J Chromatogr-A. 2000; 866 (1):35-49.
    26. Gil-Agusti M, Capella-Peiro ME, Martinavarro-Dominguez A.   Esteve-Romero J. J Chromatogr. 2003; 57 (1-2):51-57.
    27. Gil-Agusti M, Capella-Peiro ME, Monferrer-Pons L, Garcia-Alvarez-Coque MC, JEsteve-Romero J. Analyst (Cambridge, UK). 2001; 126 (4) :457-464.
    28. Lau OW, Chan K, Lau YK, Wong WC. J. Pharm .Biomed .Anal. 1989;7 (6): 725-736.
    29. Abbasi K, Bhanger MI, Khuhawar MY. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006; 41(3, 7):998-1001.
    30. Darwish IA, Sultan MA, Al-Arfaj HA. Spectrochim. Acta.   2010; 75(1):334-339.
    31. Sultan MA. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2009; 2( 2):79-85.
    32. Darwish IA, Sultan MA, Al-Arfaj HA. Talanta. 2009; 78(4-5): 1383-1388.
    33. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Q2(R1), Current Step 4 Version, Parent Guidelines on Methodology Dated November 6 1996, Incorporated  in November 2005. http://www.ich.org/LOB/media/MEDIA417.pdf (accessed February 15, 2008).
    34. Miller JC, Miller JN. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry, 5th ed., Pearson Education Limited: Harlow, England. 2005; 256.
    35. Kenneth W, Street Jr., Mayra B. Abrenica, Anal. Lett. 1986; 19:597-614.
    36. Rose J. Advanced Physico-Chemical Experiments, Pitman, London. 1964.

ContentFullText

The exquisite patterns on the luxury replica watches dial, the date display window at replica watches six o'clock, and the black sculpted Arabic numerals demonstrate the replica rolex exquisite craftsmanship of rolex watches uk the fine watchmaking style.