| Original Article |
|
|
1 Department of Life and Materials Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan;
2 Pico Device Co., Ltd., Offices, Incubation Center, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan
Corresponding author: Tetsuo Ohkuwa, Ph.D, Department of Life and Materials Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan. Tel & Fax: +81-a52-735-5199; E-mail: ohkuwa.tetsuo@nitech.ac.jp.
Short title - page header: effects of hypoxia on Nitric Oxide
| |
ABSTRACT |
|
INTRODUCTION |
|
|
METHODS |
|
|
RESULTS |
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|
|
REFERENCES |
 |
ABSTRACT
 |
|---|
This study confirmed the effects of hypoxia on nitric oxide (NO) concentrations in skin gas and exhaled air. NO concentrations in skin gas and exhaled air were measured by a chemiluminescence analyzer. Arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) of the right forefinger was determined using an oxygen saturation monitor. The M±SEM of NO concentrations in skin gas at 20.93% (control), 15.1% and 14.8% oxygen concentrations were 23.7±3.6, 32.3±4.7 and 36.2±5.2 ppb, respectively. M±SEM of NO concentrations in exhaled air at 20.93% (control), 15.1%, and 14.8% were 25.0±5.1, 35.01±5.6 and 44.9±7.2 ppb, respectively. There was no significant
difference in NO concentration at the absolute value of skin gas and exhaled air between normoxia and hypoxia. But significant increase was found at relative changes in skin gas at 15.1% (p<0.01) and 14.8% (p<0.01) oxygen content compared with control. Significant increase was also found at relative changes in exhaled air at 15.1% (p<0.01) and 14.8% (p<0.01) oxygen content compared with control. In conclusion, we confirmed that exposure to hypoxia elicits an increase in NO concentrations at relative changes of skin gas and exhaled air compared to normoxia.
KEY WORDS:
nitric oxide; hypoxia; skin gas; exhaled air
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
It has been reported that nitric oxide (NO) in exhaled air reflects the dynamics of NO production and consumption in the lungs (1, 2). NO is synthesized in various types of cells, such as endothelial, neutrophils, epithelial and autonomic nerves. NO originates close to the pulmonary vascular endothelium (3), the terminal and respiratory bronchioles (4), or the nasal epithelium (5), and it plays several important roles in the prevention of platelet aggregation, neurotransmission, the regulation of vascular tone, and blood pressure (6, 7). Others have demonstrated that the major site of NO output in the exhaled air of humans is the nasal airways (5, 8, 9). The concentration of NO in exhaled breath depends on several factors, such as inflammatory diseases (8, 10), physical exercise (4, 11), exercise training (12), smoking (5, 13), breath-holding (4, 9), hypoxia (2, 14), and hyperventilation (4).
Few reports have addressed the effects of hypoxia on exhaled NO concentrations. Beall et al. (2) demonstrated that the exhalation of nitric oxide by chronically hypoxic highlanders is greater than lowlanders. Oriveira et al. (15) reported that sheep skin NO and its metabolites are increased in burned wounds compared to non-burned skin. We previously detected methane, ethylene, ethane, and ammonia gases emanating from human skin (16, 17). No reports have referenced the effect of hypoxia on NO concentration in skin gas. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of hypoxia on NO concentrations in skin gas and exhaled air.
|
|
METHODS
|
|---|
Subjects
Participants for this experiment were fourteen healthy, nonsmoking, moderately trained male swimmers who swam at least 4~6 times a week. The study’s purpose, protocol, and possible risks were fully explained before each subject signed an informed consent agreement. The mean and standard error of mean (M ± SEM) of age, height, weight and mean body mass index (BMI) of the participants were 21.4 ± 0.97 years, 171.1 ± 1.54 cm, 67.3 ± 1.82 kg, and 22.9 ± 0.64 kg/m2, respectively.
Experimental protocol
Subjects sat comfortably and breathed normally wearing a nose clip for ten min in normoxic (20.93%) and hypoxic conditions (15.4, 15.1, and 14.8% oxygen concentrations for 20 min). Exhaled air was collected in a gas sampling bag (Tedlar bag; GL Science, Tokyo, Japan) that had been washed with pure nitrogen. Subjects breathed normally for 30 sec and were then asked to take one more normal breath. While the exhaled air was being collected, skin gas was also collected in a gas sampling bag (Tedlar bag) from the left hand. Skin gas was collected by the modified methods described in our previous study (16). The left hand was washed with running tap and distilled water, wiped with paper, and inserted into the sampling bag. Next, the sampling bag was washed twice with pure nitrogen gas. 100ml of pure nitrogen gas was injected into the sampling bag, as shown in Fig. 1. Skin gas was collected by covering the left hand for three minutes with skin gas sampling bags made of a polyvinyl fluoride sheet (GL Science, Tokyo, Japan). The left wrist was fixed with a flexible sealing film and a band to prevent skin gas leakage through the space between the bag and skin.
To calculate the hand’s total surface area, the length of each finger and its circumference at the center point was measured. The surface areas of the palm and back of the hand were calculated from the length of one side, the other side, and the thickness.
An hypoxic environment was maintained using a normobaric hypoxic chamber. The hypoxic control system consisted of an oxygen control unit (YHS-CO5 B, YKS, Nara, Japan) and an air compressor (SLP-22 CO, YKS).
NO concentrations in the skin gas and exhaled air were measured by a chemiluminescence analyzer (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan), using continuous samplings from a mixing chamber at a rate of 260 ml/min. The analyzer’s detection limit was 1 ppb for NO, with a 90% response time of about 1 sec. The analyzer was calibrated before each measurement using pure nitrogen and five certified NO concentrated gases (159, 79.8, 39.9, 19.9, and 9.98 ppb). Arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) of the right forefinger was determined using an oxygen saturation monitor (Pulsox-2; Konika Minolta, Osaka, Japan).
Statistical analysis
Values were expressed as mean and standard errors of the mean (M ± SEM) of the duplicate measurements of each sample. Data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance with repeated measures with p < 0.05 determined to be statistically significant. When differences were obtained, post hoc analyses were performed using Sheffe’s F. Statistical analysis was calculated with Stat View (Ver. 5.0, Avacuus Concepts Inc).
| RESULTS |
|---|
Figure 2 represents the changes in the SpO2 levels in the inhalation of 20.93% oxygen (normoxia), 15.4%, 15.1% and 14.8% oxygen. SpO2 levels with oxygen inhalation of 15.4%, 15.1% and 14.8% were significantly lower than normoxia (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001).
Figure 3 shows the effects of hypoxia on NO concentration in skin gas whose skin gas NO level tended to increase with a decrease of the oxygen concentration of inhalation, but it was not significant (Fig 3A). Figure 3B represents the percentage changes of the value at normoxia. Under hypoxia of 15.1% and 14.8%, NO concentrations in skin gas were significantly higher than normoxia (Fig.3B) (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001). The exhaled air NO level tended to increase with a decrease of the inhalation of oxygen concentration, but it was not significant (Fig. 4A). Under hypoxia of 15.1% and 14.8%, NO concentrations in expired air were significantly higher than normoxia (Fig. 4B) (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01). Oxygen content was not found to correlate significantly with NO concentrations in skin gas (r = −0.281) and in exhaled air (r = −0.195). The M±SEM of the total hand area in subjects (n=8) was 752.8±17.80 cm2. The M±SEM of NO concentration was 34.41±9.60ppb. No significant correlation was found between NO concentration and the hand’s surface area(r=0.024, n=8). NO concentration/surface area of the hand (ppb/cm2) related to NO concentration (r=0.996, p<0.01). These results suggest that NO concentration is independent on the surface area of the hand.
| DISCUSSIONS
|
|---|
The present study indicates that SpO2 was significantly lower in hypoxia compared with normoxia, suggesting that moderate exposure to hypoxia induced SpO2 reduction, which basically agrees with previous reports (18, 19).
There was no significant difference in NO concentration at the absolute value of skin gas and exhaled air between normoxia and hypoxia (Figs. 3A and 4A). But significant increase was found at relative changes in skin gas at 15.1% (p<0.01) and 14.8% (p<0.01) oxygen content compared with control (Fig 3B). Significant increase was also found at relative changes in exhaled air at 15.1% (p<0.01) and 14.8% (p<0.01) oxygen content compared with control (Fig. 4B).
This study clarified that hypoxia increases NO concentrations in exhaled air and skin gas. Our results are consistent with Hample et al. (14), who showed that acute hypoxia induced NO production increases in cultured bovine pulmonary arterial endothelial cells. Beall et al. (2) also reported that exhaled NO concentrations were higher in the chronically hypoxic populations of Tibetans living at 4,200m than in lowlanders. Strijdom et al. (20) demonstrated that hypoxia activates NO production increases in cardiac microvessel endothelial cells. Justices et al. (21) found that hypoxia increased NO production, endothelial NO synthase protein, and endothelial NO synthase mRNA in epicardial arteries. Arnet et al. (22) also demonstrated that exposure to hypoxia induces increases in endothelial NO synthase mRNA and protein expression in bovine aortic endothelial cells. In contrast to the above reports of hypoxia-induced NO production increase, Whorton et al. (23) demonstrated that exposure to hypoxia caused a decrease in the NO production of bovine aortic endothelial cells. Hong et al. (24) also reported that hypoxia inhibited NO production in smooth muscle. On the other hand, Tsujino et al. (25) concluded that the inhalation of hypoxic gas did not cause any significant change in NO concentration in exhaled air. These conflicting results may reflect different experimental conditions, such as hypoxia severity, duration of exposure to hypoxia, sampling sites, and so on.
In conclusion, we confirmed that exposure to hypoxia elicits an increase in NO concentrations at relative changes of skin gas and exhaled air compared to normoxia.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
This study was supported by Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. The authors wish to thank Masumi Tachino, Akifumi Kamiya, Yoshihito Suzuki and Hisao Hakamata at Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. for providing us with a chemiluminescence analyzer. This study was also supported by the Aichi Science and Technology Foundation.
|
|
REFERENCES
|
|---|
1. Dweik RA, Laskowski D, Abu-soud HM, Kaneko FT, Hutte R, Stuehr DJ, Erzurum SC: Nitric oxide synthesis in the lung. J Clin Invest 1998;101:660-666.
2. Beall C, Laskowski D, Strohl KP, Soria R, Villena M, Vargas E, Alarcon AM, Gonzales C, Erzurum SC: Pulmonary nitric oxide in mountain dwellers. Natur 2001;414:411-412.
3. Cremona G, Higenbottam T, Takao M, Hall L, Bower EA: Exhaled nitric oxide in isolated pig lungs. J Appl Physiol 1995;78:59-63.
4. Persson MG., Wiklund NP, Gustafsson LE: Endogenous nitric oxide in single exhalations and the change during exercise. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;148:1210-1214.
5. Gerlach H, Rossaint R, Pappert D, Knorr M, Falke KJ: Autoinhalation of nitric oxide after endogenous synthesis in nasopharynx. Lancet 1994;343:518-519.
6. Ignarro LJ: Haem-dependent activation of guanylate cyclase and cyclic GMP formation by endogenous nitric oxide: a unique transduction mechanism for transcellular signaling. Pharmacol Toxicol 1990; 67:1-7.
7. Brann DW, Bhat GK, Lamar CA, Mahesh VB: Gaseous transmitters and neuroendocrine regulation. Neuroendocrinology 1997; 65:385-395.
8. Alving K, Weizberg E, Lundberg JM: Increased amount of nitric oxide in exhaled air of asthmatics. Eur Respir J 1993;6:1368-1370.
9. Kimberly B, Nejadnik B, Giraud GD, Holden WE: Nasal contribution to exhaled nitric oxide at rest and during breathholding in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:829-836.
10. Kharitonov SA, Yates D, Robbins RA, Logan-Sinclair R, Shinebourne EA, Barnes PJ: Increased nitric oxide in exhaled air of asthmatic patients. Lancet 1994;343:133-135.
11. Bauer JA, Wald JA, Doran S, Soda D: Endogenous nitric oxide in expired air. Effects of acute exercise in human. Life Sci 1994;55:1903-1909.
12. Maroun MJ, Mehta S, Turcotte R, Cosio MG, Hussain SNA: Effects of physical conditioning on endogenous nitric oxide output during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1995;79:1219-1225.
13. Persson MG, Zetterström O, Agrenius V, Ihre E, Gustafsson LE: Single-breath nitric oxide measurements in asthmatic patients and smokers. Lancet 1994;343:146-147.
14. Hample V, Cornfield DN, Cowan NJ, Archer SL: Hypoxia potentiates nitric oxide synthesis and transiently increases cytosolic calcium levels in pulmonary artery endothelials cells. Eur Respir J 1995;8:515-522.
15. Oliveira GV, Shimoda K, Enkhbaatar P, Jodin J, Burke AS,Chinkes DL, Hawkins HK, Herndon DN, Traber L, Traber D, Murakami K: Skin nitric oxide and its metabolites are increased in nonburned skin after thermal injuries. Shock 2004:22:278-282.
16. Nose K, Mizuno T, Yamane N, Kondo T, Ohtani H. Araki S, Tsuda T: Identification of ammonia in gas emanated from human skin and its correlation with that in blood. Anal Sci 2005;21: 1-4.
17. Nose K, Nunome Y, Kondo T, Araki S, Tsuda T: Identification of gas emanated from human skin: methane, ethylene, and ethane. Anal Sci 2005;21:625-628.
18. Andersen JB, Hedrick MS, Wang T: Cardiovascular responses to hypoxia and anaemia in the toad Bufo marinus. J Exp Biol 2003;206:857-865.
19. Sheel AW, Edwards MR, Hunte G.S, McKenzie DC: Influence of inhaled nitric oxide on gas exchange during normoxic and hypoxic exercise inhighly trained cyclists. J Appl Physiol 2001;90:926-932.
20. Strijdom H, Jacobs S, Hattingh S, Page C, Lochner A: Nitric oxide production is higher in rat cardiac microvessel endothelial cells than ventricular cardiomyocytes in baseline and hypoxic conditions: a comparative study. FASEB J 2006;20:314-316.
21. Justice JM, Tanner MA, Myers PR: Endothelial cell regulation of nitric oxide production during hypoxia in coronary microvessels and epicardial arteries. J Cell Physiol 2000;182:359-365.
22. Arnet UA, McMillan A, Dinerman JL, Ballermann B, Lowenstein CJ: Regulation of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase during hypoxia. J Biol Chem 1996;271:15069-15073.
23. Whorton AR, Simonds DB, Piantadosi CA: Regulation of nitric oxide synthesis by oxygen in vascular endotherial cells. Am J Physiol 1997;272:L1161-L1166.
24. Hong Y, Suzuki S, Yatoh S, Mizutani M, Nakajima T, Bannai S, Sato H, Soma M, Okuda Y, Yamada N: Effect of hypoxia on nitric oxide production and its synthase gene expression in rat smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000;268:329-332.
25. Tsujino I, Miyamoto K, Nishimura M, Shinano H, Makita H, Saito S, Nakano T, Kawakami Y: Production of nitric oxide (NO) intrathoracic airways of normal human. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996:154;1370-1374.
