Received- July 24, 2013; Accepted- August 26, 2013
 International Journal of Biomedical Science 11(1), 48-53, Mar 15, 2015
ORIGINAL ARTICLE


© 2015   G. Oboh et al. Master Publishing Group

Inhibition of Cholinesterases and Some Pro-Oxidant induced Oxidative Stress in Rats Brain by Two Tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum) Varieties

G. Oboh, O.O. Bakare, A.O. Ademosun, A. J. Akinyemi, T.A. Olasehinde

Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals research Unit, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Technology, P.M.B., 704, Akure 340001, Nigeria

Corresponding Author: G. Oboh, Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals research Unit, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Technology, P.M.B., 704, Akure 340001, Nigeria. Tel: +2347031388644; E-mail: goboh2001@yahoo.com.

Running title: Anticholinesterase activity of tomatoes


  ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
REFERENCES


 ABSTRACT

This study sought to investigate the effects of two tomato varieties [Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. esculentum (ESC) and Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. cerasiforme (CER)] on acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) activities in vitro. Phenolics content, carotenoids characterisation, inhibition of Fe2+ and quinolinic acid-induced malondialdehyde (MDA) production in rats brain homogenate and NO* scavenging abilities were also assesed in addition to the AChE and BChE inhibition assays. There was no significant difference in the AChE inhibitory ability of the samples, while CER had significantly higher BChE inhibitory activity. Furthermore, the tomatoes inhibited Fe2+ and quinolinic acid-induced MDA production and further exhibited antioxidant activities through their NO* scavenging abilities. There was no significant difference in the phenolic content of the samples, while significantly high amounts of lycopene were detected in the tomatoes. The cholinesterase-inhibition and antioxidant properties of the “tomatoes” could make them good dietary means for the management of neurodegenerative disorders.

KEY WORDS:    Tomato; Acetylcholinesterase, Butyrylcholinesterase; Phenolics; Carotenoids

 INTRODUCTION

   Tomatoes, which are consumed fresh, cooked or in tomato-based products are among the most commonly consumed vegetables worldwide and are rich sources of carotenoids and flavonoids (1). The most abundant carotenoid in tomatoes is lycopene and it has gained a lot of interest in functional food research in recent times due to its strong antioxidant properties and linkage to reduced risk of cancers and some age-related diseases (1). A common form of age-related dementia is Alzheimer’s disease (AD) which is characterized by a progressive degeneration of the nervous system and cognitive impairments (2). A modern approach to the management of this degenerative disease is the use of ChE inhibitors which inhibit AChE and BChE activites (3).

   Functional foods are being investigated as cheap sources of AChE and BChE inhibitors due to the high cost of AD management and hepatotoxicity shown by some synthetic cholinesterase inhibitors (4,5) and some phenolic-rich food sources have been shown to inhibit AChE and BChE activities and also possess strong antioxidant properties (6). Antioxidants have also been suggested to be effective in the management of neurodegenerative conditions as radical-induced oxidative damage have been implicated in AD (7). More so, the low level of antioxidant enzymes and high use of oxygen makes the brain readily susceptible to free-radical attack (8). This study sought to investigate the effects of two tomato varieties [ESC and CER] on AChE and BChE activities in vitro as well as their antioxidant properties.

 MATERIALS AND METHODS

   Sample collection

   Two varieties of common tomatoes: ESC and CER were collected from the Igoba Farm, Akure, South West, Nigeria [7.2500° N, 5.1950° E]. The samples were identified, washed, weighed and then homogenized in a blender after distilled water was added. The homogenate was centrifuged at 4500 g for 15 min. The supernatant was recovered and kept in the freezer for subsequent analysis.

   Methods

   AChE and BChE inhibition assay. The AChE activity was determined in a reaction mixture containing 200 μL of brain AChE solution (EC 3.1.1.7) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, 100 μL of a solution of 5,5′-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic) acid (DTNB 3.3 mM in 0.1 M phosphate buffered solution, pH 7.0, containing NaHCO3 6 mM), sample solution (0–100 μL) and 500 μL of phosphate buffer, pH 8.0. After incubation for 20 min at 25°C, 100 μL of 0.05 mM acetylthiocholine iodide was added as the substrate. AChE activity was determined by monitoring changes in absorbance at 412 nm for 3 minutes. 100 μL of butyrylthiocholine iodide was used as a substrate to assay for BChE enzyme, while all the other reagents and conditions were the same (9).

   Lipid peroxidation assay: Preparation of Brain Homogenates. The rats were decapitated under mild diethyl ether anaesthesia and the brain was rapidly isolated and placed on ice and weighed. This tissue was subsequently homogenized in cold saline (1/10 w/v) with about 10-up-and–down strokes at approximately 1200 rev/min in a Teflon glass homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 g to yield a pellet that was discarded, and a low-speed supernatant (S1) was kept for lipid peroxidation assay (10).

   Lipid Peroxidation and Thiobarbibutric Acid Reactions. 100 µL S1 fraction was mixed with a reaction mixture containing 30 µL of 0.1 M pH 7.4 Tris-HCl buffer, different concentrations of the samples and 30 µL of 250 µM freshly prepared FeSO4 (the procedure was also carried out using 15 mM quinolinic acid). The volume was made up to 300 µL with water before incubation at 37°C for 1 h. The colour reaction was developed by adding 300 µL 8.1% SDS (Sodium doudecyl sulphate) to the reaction mixture containing S1, which was subsequently followed by the addition of 600 µL of acetic acid/HCl (pH 3.4) mixture and 600 µL 0.8% TBA. This mixture was incubated at 100°C for 1 h. TBARS produced were measured at 532 nm (11).

   NO* scavenging activity. Briefly, 0.3 mL of sodium nitroprusside (5 mM) was added to 1 mL each of various concentrations of the samples and then incubated at 25°C for 150 min. Thereafter, 0.5 mL of Griess reagent was added. The absorbance was measured at 546 nm (12).

   Determination of total phenol content. Appropriate dilutions of the samples were oxidized with 2.5 mL 10% folin-ciocalteau’s reagent (v/v) and neutralized by 2.0 mL of 7.5% sodium carbonate. The reaction mixture was incubated for 40 minutes at 45°C and the absorbance was measured at 765 nm (13).

   Determination of total flavonoid content. 0.5 ml of appropriately diluted samples were mixed with 0.5 µL of 10% AlCl3, 50 µL of 1 mol.L-1 potassium acetate and 1.4 mL water, and was incubated at room temperature for 30 min. thereafter. Absorbance was measured at 415 mm (14).

   Characterization of carotenoid constituent. Carotenoids extraction was carried out by the modified method of Takagi (15). The pulverized samples were homogenized in 75 mL acetone and kept at room temperature for 1hour in the dark. The homogenate was filtered through filter paper by suction. The extracts were combined and evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was re-extracted by a mixture of diethyl ether and petroleum ether in equal ratio. The extract was concentrated with a rotary evaporator and dried using anhydrous sodium sulphate. The extracts (1 µL: 20:1 split) were analyzed for composition by comparison with standards (Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, W1) on a Hewlett-Packard 5890 gas chromatograph (Hewlett-Packard Corp., Palo Alto, CA) equipped with a derivatized, nonpacked injection liner, a AC-5 capillary column (30m length, 0.25 mm column id., 0.25 µm film thickness), and detected with a flame ionization detector (FID).

   Data analysis

   The results of triplicate experiments were pooled and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (STD). One way analysis of variance was used to analyze the results and the least significance difference (LSD) was carried out (16).

 RESULTS

   The extracts inhibited AChE activity in a dose-dependent manner as shown in Figure 1. However, the IC50 values revealed no significant (P>0.05) difference between the two samples [ESC (IC50 = 5.83 mg/ml), CER (IC50 = 5.70 mg/ml)]. The butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory ability of the samples as presented in Figure 2 and the IC50 in Table 1 revealed that CER (IC50 = 3.75 mg/ml) had significantly higher inhibitory activity than ESC (IC50 = 7.42 mg/ml). The incubation of rat’s brain homogenates in presence of Fe2+ caused a significant increase (P<0.05) in the malondialdehyde (MDA) content (Figure 3). The samples inhibited MDA production in a dose-dependent manner, with CER (IC50 = 224.14 µg/ml) having significantly (P<0.05) higher inhibitory ability than ESC (IC50 = 256.95 µg/ml). Similarly, incubation of rat’s brain homogenates in presence of quinolinic acid caused a significant increase (P<0.05) in the malondialdehyde (MDA) content (156%) (Figure 4). ESC (IC50 = 243.51 µg/ml) had the higher inhibition of quinolinic acid-induced MDA production. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 5 and Table 1, ESC (IC50 = 10.93 µg/ml) had significantly (P<0.05) higher NO* scavenging ability than CER (IC50 = 14.09 µg/ml).

   The results of the total phenol and flavonoid contents of the samples are presented in Table 1. The total phenolic content reported as gallic acid equivalent revealed that there was no significant (P>0.05) difference in the total phenolic content of the two tomato cvarieties [ESC (3.48 mg/g), CER (3.42 mg/g)], while the total flavonoid result revealed that ESC (0.62 mg/g) had significantly (P<0.05) higher total flavonoid content than CER (0.41 mg/g). The carotenoid characterization as presented in Table 1 revealed the presence of neo-xanthin, viola-xanthin, beta-carotene, lutein and a high amount of lycopene [ESC (4.2881 mg/100 g), CER (4.3747 mg/100 g)].


View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 1: Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of two tomato varieties. ESC, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. esculentum; CER, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. cerasiforme.
 

View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 2: Butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of two tomato varieties. ESC, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. esculentum; CER, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. cerasiforme.
 

View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 3: Inhibition of Fe2+ - induced MDA production in rat’s brain homogenate by two tomato varieties. ESC, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. esculentum; CER, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. cerasiforme.
 

View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 4: Inhibition of quinolinic acid - induced MDA production in rat’s brain homogenate by two tomato varieties. ESC, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. esculentum; CER, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. cerasiforme.
 

View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 5: NO* scavenging ability of two tomato varieties. ESC, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. esculentum; CER, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. cerasiforme.
 

View larger version :
[in a new window]
Figure 6: The main carotenoid contents of (A) Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. esculentum and (B) Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. cerasiforme.
 
View this table:
[in a new window]
Table 1. IC50 values for the acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activities, inhibition of FeSO4 and Quinolinic acid induced MDA production in rats brain homogenates in vitro. Total phenol and total flavonoid content and main carotenoid constituents of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. esculentum (ESC) and Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. cerasiforme (CER)

 DISCUSSION

   The inhibition of the cholinesterases’ activities by the tomatoes studied could be of immense importance as it is a modern therapeutic approach in the management of neurodegenerative conditions. Furthermore, the ability of the samples to inhibit BChE activity is also of therapeutic importance as BChE variant has been shown to increase brain susceptibility to certain forms of Alzheimer’s disease and the neurotoxicity of certain plaques can be increased by the presence of BChE (17, 18). The ChE inhibition by the samples could be linked to their phenolic content as some phenolic compounds have been shown to inhibit AChE activity (19).

   The incubation of rat’s brain homogenates in presence of Fe2+ and quinolinic acid caused a significant increase (P<0.05) in the MDA content, however, the tomato samples inhibited Fe2+ and quinolinic acid- induced MDA production in a dose-dependent manner. Elevated brain iron levels have been linked to the etiology of neurodegenerative conditions (20) as there is increased iron transport across the blood-brain barrier in conditions of extracellular iron overload (21). The increased iron in the brain results in the formation of reactive oxygen species which facilitates lipid peroxidation via Fenton reaction (22). This explains the significant increase in MDA content after incubation of rat’s brain homogenates in the presence of Fe2+ since there is a huge amount of brain phospholipids which contain oxidizable polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) which are easily attacked by radicals which could ultimately result in AD (23). The increase in MDA content after incubation of rat’s brain homogenates in presence of quinolinic acid can be attributed to the ability of quinolinic acid to form complexes that induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation and consequently MDA production via lipid peroxidation (24). Furthermore, quinolinic acid induced radical production has been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of AD (25). Therefore, the inhibition of quinolinic acid induced MDA production by the samples could prove beneficial in the management of AD.

   Radical–induced oxidative damage has been implicated in the etiology of Alzheimer’s disease because the high oxygen use of the brain coupled with high amount of oxidizable fatty acids makes the brain sensitive to free radical–induced oxidative (7). Therefore, the NO* scavenging ability of the two varieties (Figure 3) as revealed by this study could be beneficial in the management and prevention of neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, strategies directed at reducing quinolinic acid induced damage would also be beneficial as NO* production in the brain may be quinolinic acid induced (26). The observed antioxidant properties of the tomatoes could be linked to their lycopene content as molecular studies have shown that lycopene is a very potent antioxidant due to its higher number of conjugated double bonds (27). There was no significant (P>0.05) difference in the total phenolic content of the two tomato varieties, while ESC had significantly (P<0.05) higher total flavonoid content than CER (Table 1). The carotenoid characterization revealed a high amount of lycopene, which agrees with earlier research where lycopene was reported to account for 90% of total carotenoids and other phytochemicals present in tomatoes (28). Animal experiments and epidemological studies have shown that tomato consumption have been linked to a reduced risk of degenerative diseases due to the lycopene content (29, 30).

 CONCLUSION

   Inhibition of ChEs and lipid peroxidation by the tomato varieties, as well as the NO* scavenging abilities, could be part of the mechanism by which tomato manage and/or prevent AD. The differences in the flavonoid and carotenoid contents between the two varieties could also explain the differences in the observed bioactivities. However, further in vivo experiments and clinical trials are recommended.

 CONFLICT OF INTEREST

   The authors declare that no conflicting interests exist.

 REFERENCES

    1. Hanson P, Yang R, Wu J, et al. Variation for Antioxidant Activity and Antioxidants in Tomato. J. Ame. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2004; 129: 704-711.
    2. Nie K, Yu J, Fu Y, et al. Age-related decrease in constructive activation of Akt/PKB in SAMP10 hippocampus. Biochem. Biophy. Res. Comm. 2009; 378: 103-107.
    3. Contestabile A. The history of the cholinergic hypothesis. Behav. Brain. Res. 2011; 221: 334-340.
    4. National Institute on Aging: Alzheimer’s disease; unraveling the mystery. www.bu.edu/alzresearch/care/documents/ADEAR UnravelingtheMystery 2003;12: 03.pdf (accessed September 2011).
    5. Knapp M, Knopman D, Solomon P, et al. A 30-week randomized controlled trial of highdose tacrine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. The Tacrine Study Group. J. Ame. Med. Assoc. 1994; 271: 985–991.
    6. Adewusi E, Moodley N, Steenkamp V. Medicinal Plants with cholinesterase activity: A Review. Afr. J. Biotech. 2010; 9: 8257-8276.
    7. Butterfield D, Castenga A, Pocernich C, et al. Nutritional approaches to combat oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s diseases. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2002; 13: 444–461.
    8. Tuppo E, Forman L Free radical oxidative damage and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Ame. Osteo. Assoc. 2001; 101: 11–15.
    9. Perry N, Houghton P, Theobald A, et al. In vitro activity of S lavandulaefolia (Spanish sage) relevant to treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Pharmacol. 2002; 52: 895–902.
    10. Belle N, Dalmolin G, Fonini G, et al. Polyamines reduces lipid peroxidation induced by different pro-oxidant agents. Brain Res. 2004; 1008: 245–251.
    11. Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K. Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal. Biochem. 1979; 95: 351–358.
    12. Susanta K, Chakraborty G, Gupta M, Mazumder U. In vitro antioxidant activity of dispyro.s malabarica kostel bark. India J. Exp. Biol. 2006; 44: 39–44.
    13. Singleton VL, Orthofor R, Lamuela-Raventos RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocaltau reagent. Method. Enzymol. 1999;299: 152–178.
    14. Meda A, Lamie C, Romito M, et al. Determination of the total phenolic, flavonoid and proline contents in Burkina Faso honey, as well as their radical scavenging activity. Food Chem. 2005; 91: 571–577.
    15. Takagi S. Determination of Green Leaf Carotenoids by HPLC. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1985; 49 (4): 1211-1213.
    16. Zar J. Biostatistical Analysis. USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1984; p620.
    17. Ballard C. Advances in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease benefits of dual cholinesterase inhibition. Euro. Neurol. 2002;47: 64-70.
    18. Weinstock M. Selectivity of cholinesterase inhibition. Clinical implications for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Drugs. 1999; 12: 307-313.
    19. Oboh G, Agunloye O, Akinyemi A, et al. Comparative Study on the Inhibitory Effect of Caffeic and Chlorogenic Acids on Key Enzymes Linked to Alzheimer’s Disease and Some Pro-oxidant Induced Oxidative Stress in Rats’ Brain-In Vitro. Neurochem. Res. 2012.
    20. Lovell M, Robertson J, Teesdale W, et al. Copper, iron and zinc in Alzheimer’s disease senile plaques. J. Neurol. Sci. 1998; 158: 47-52.
    21. Evan Gelder W, Huijskes-Heins M, Cleton-Soeteman M, et al. Iron uptake in blood-brain barrier endothelial cells cultured in iron-depleted and iron-enriched media. J. Neurochem. 1998; 71: 1134-1140.
    22. Koppenol W, Butler J, Van L. The Haber-Weiss cycle. Photochem. Photobiol. 1978; 28: 655-660.
    23. Hazel J, Williams E. The role of alterations in membrane lipid compositions in enabling physiological adaptation of organisms to their physical environment. Prog. Lipid Res. 1990; 26: 167–227.
    24. Platenik J, Stopka P, Vejrazka M. Quinolinic acid–iron (II) complexes: slow autooxidation, but enhanced hydroxyl radical production in the Fenton reaction. Free Rad. Res. 2001; 34: 445–459.
    25. Guillemin G, Wang L, Brew B. Quinolinic acid selectively induces apoptosis of human astocytes: potential role in AIDS dementia complex. J. Neuroinflammation. 2005; 2: 16
    26. Braidy N, Grant R, Adams S, Brew B, et al. Mechanism for quinolinic acid cytotoxicity in human astrocytes and neurons. Neurotoxicol. Res. 2009; 16: 77–86.
    27. Di Mascio P, Kaiser S, Sies H. Lycopene as the most efficient biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher. Arch. Biochem. Biophy. 1989; 274: 532-538.
    28. Khachik F, Carvalho L, Bernstein P, et al. Chemistry, distribution, and metabolism of tomato carotenoids and their impact on human health. Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood). 2002; 227: 845–851.
    29. Hertog M, Feskens E, Hollman P, et al. Dietary antioxidant flavonoids and risk of coronary heart disease: the Zutphen elderly study. Lancet. 1993; 342: 1007-1011.
    30. Kaur C, Kapoor H. Antioxidants in fruits and vegetables the millennium's health. I. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2001; 36: 703-725.

ContentFullText

The exquisite patterns on the luxury replica watches dial, the date display window at replica watches six o'clock, and the black sculpted Arabic numerals demonstrate the replica rolex exquisite craftsmanship of rolex watches uk the fine watchmaking style.